May 24, 2000
Board
of Education Digs In
Restricts Public's Right To Speak
by Stewart Lilker
In the first meeting after the recent
district wide election, the Board of Education dug in its heels,
continuing its unresponsiveness to the residents.
The evening’s agenda, presumably
prepared by the District Clerk, Mary Bediako, was incomplete and sloppily
prepared. As usual, the minutes subject to Board approval were not
available for public inspection. Continuing the new Board practice, the
dates of the minutes subject to approval were absent from the agenda. The
attitude of the Clerk, as expressed to FNYN after the meeting, is that the
minutes "are the Board’s minutes" and they don’t have to be
made available to the public. Bediako maintained that the minutes are
available in the Freeport Public Library. History has proven that they are
never received by the library before they are approved. At times, months
have passed before the Board minutes are forwarded to the library. This
practice began in earnest after an appeal was filed with the Commissioner
of Education to remove the Board for having secret School Board Meetings.
The Board and its renegade Attorney, Larry Reich, seem to feel that
keeping the public in the dark about the public’s business leaves them
less vulnerable to legal action.
Questions regarding another new practice
of the Board, not attaching the winning bids to the evenings agenda were
ignored by the Board. Other items that were previously available at the
Board meetings are no longer available. They are the treasurer’s report
and the high school funds report.
There were less than ten members of the
public present at the Board meeting. Recently, without any public
discussion, the board changed their long standing practice of giving the
public the right to address them as a body, after the agenda is read.
Board President Grover has announced many times in the past, that it is a
"privilege to address the Board and not a right." Now, after the
Board runs through the agenda, the Board members and the Administrative
staff make a break for the surrounding tables, leaving the pubic in the
dust, as they surround themselves with their supporters.
Alan Jay, using his allotted time for the
agenda items, addressed the Board on this issue. Mr. Jay asked, "Are
you going to bust up this meeting again for these useless round
tables?" Board Vice President Renken replied, "That’s your
decision. We are going to have round tables. Anybody that has comments to
make can talk to specific board members and members of the
administration." Mr. Jay, observed, "So you have to repeat the
same thing four or five different times," and then asked, "Is
this going to be a permanent change?" Renken responded, "The
change was established at the last meeting by the President."
High School PTA Co-president, Stephanie
Cieslik asked, "What about the community?" Renken answered,
"This is a board of education meeting and the rules of decorum are
developed by the Board of Education for the conduct of the meeting."
FNYN asked, "What is that, executive
fiat? Where is that in the rules?"
Mr. Jay concluded, "I have a copy of
the Constitution here. The people shall have a right to redress of
grievances. A five minute restriction on just the agenda does not give an
opportunity for the public to avail themselves of their rights. They are
being restricted arbitrarily by you. This seems to be a back door attempt
to stifle the public and I think it is wrong." Mr. Jay then shrugged
his shoulders and took his seat.
Next up to the microphone was your
reporter. FNYN asked the Board about the missing dates of the minutes,
"Can you tell me why you stopped listing those dates and when you
decided to do that?" Renken, apparently never having looked at the
people’s agenda, answered, "They are listed." FNYN responded,
"Not on my agenda."
District Clerk Bediako jumped into the
conversation, "If it is not on the agenda, it is an error."
FNYN: "It was also not put on the
last agenda."
After some brief conversation FNYN
continued, addressing VP Renken, "Can you tell me why the minutes
aren’t available for anybody else in the room. Only you.?"
Renken refused to answer, referring the
question to Bediako. Most of Bediako remarks were unintelligible, however
she could be understood to falsely state, "Mr. Lilker, you have all
the minutes."
FNYN commenting about the purposeful
unavailability of the Board’s minutes at School Board meetings said,
"I would just like to remind you that in communities that score like
Freeport, Hempstead and Roosevelt, those minutes have for years been
available for the public at their school board meetings."
FNYN questioned the Board regarding the
bids. "What are the bids and why is there no documentation in support
of the bids, as was available in the past?" Bediako volunteered,
"Mr. Lilker, the bids are supporting documents for the Board."
Renken said, "I will look into it. I will send you a letter of
information."
FNYN then brought up the issue of the
change of meeting format. "Could you tell me when you discussed
changing the format of this meeting to establish these round table
discussions?"
Renken responded, "This was done at a
work session of the Board."
FNYN: "Was there an official vote on
this?
Renken: "We don't need one for that.
There was an agreement."
FNYN: "Was it in any of the minutes,
where you agreed?"
Renken: "It’s not in those minutes.
It’s not a matter of a Board vote, so it’s not in the minutes."
Your reporter has attended all the recent
meetings of the Board of Education. The Board has never publicly discussed
any changes of meeting format. The recent planning meeting (work session)
agendas make no mention of "meeting format" as a discussion
item. Renken’s claim that the matter was discussed is not supported by
the record.
FNYN then had some questions for the Board
regarding the district’s personnel. "My understanding is that Dr.
Ciaglia is leaving in July. Can you tell me why he is not on this
termination of staff report? And is it true that he is leaving?"
Renken replied, "To the best of my
knowledge, Dr. Ciaglia is not leaving. The bottom line is that is a
personnel issue and that is not discussed at public meetings."
FNYN, holding up the personnel handout,
"We have two sheets of personnel matters."
Renken responded, "Obviously, you don’t
see Dr. Ciaglia’s name, so he is not leaving."
Dr. Ciaglia, out of the blue, chimed in,
"Stool pigeons have bad poop, Stew."
After Ciaglia’s outburst, Renken
encouraged Ciaglia to calm himself
FNYN: "My next question has do with
the transfer of the principal, Gladys Andrews, from the Archer Street
School to Atkinson. Can you tell me if that is on here anywhere? And why
is she being transferred?"
Renken, having not read the meetings
agenda, claimed, "That is not an agenda item."
People in the audience volunteered,
"Yes it is."
Renken went on. "It is an internal
transfer of a principal from one building to another building and it is
not a matter of format protocol."
FNYN: "Could you tell my why she is
being transferred? She is on the agenda."
Renken equivocated, "The key to that
is, it is the Superintendent’s review of her administrative needs and
basically the Superintendent has decided, in conjunction with the
administrative staff and with the approval of the Board, that a person
would be transferred from one building to another building."
FNYN, "Is this another case of a
principal of a school being transferred in opposition to their own wishes?
Was Ms. Andrews in favor of being transferred? Did she request the
transfer, or is this similar to the Mike Campbell debacle at the high
school?"
Incredibly, the Superintendent spoke up
for the first time at a public meeting in months. Superintendent Moffett
enlightened the public with following, "We are not answering. That is
a question we are not answering."
FNYN continued, "It is my
understanding that Dean Schroeder is leaving the district. Is that true?
Is she resigning?"
Renken replied, "That’s personnel,
we’re not discussing it?"
FNYN: "There are sheets of personnel
matters, so you can’t hide behind a ‘personnel matter’."
Renken: "That’s not a personnel
matter."
FNYN asked the Board about the rumor
regarding the transfer of the high school AP's to other schools in the
district. Board VP Renken categorically denied this, stating that it wasn’t
true.
PTA co-president Stephanie Cieslik was the
last member of the community to ask any questions. She asked, "On the
calendar of events you are missing the Freeport High School curriculum
meeting." This meeting was scheduled to advise and inform the High
School student’s parents of the coming years curriculum.
Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum
Ciaglia responded, "Letters were sent out advising everyone."
Ms. Cieslik asked, "So why isn’t it on the calendar?" The
Board and the Administration ignored the question.
After the Board rocketed through the
agenda, they got up from their chairs and fled to safety of the round
tables, where surrounded by their supporters, they were insulated from the
prying questions of the public. Ms. Cieslik did manage to track down
Superintendent Moffett before she made it to the safety of one of the
round tables. Ms Cieslik reported that she asked the Superintendent if she
had looked into the matter of false allegations against her (Cieslik).
These allegations were publicly brought up over a month ago, when the
Superintendent stated that she would look into them. When Ms. Cieslik
caught up with the Superintendent after the meeting, asking her if she had
looked into the matter, Moffett said, "Not yet," turning her
back and walking away to one of the round tables.
The recently enacted meeting procedures
left some members of the public muttering in disgust, refusing to chase
the Board and the Administration around the room from table to table. Alan
Jay said, "This looks like law suit." Frustrated PTA
co-president Stephanie Cieslik said, "This is terrible. This has to
stop." Newly elected School Board member, Sunday Coward, was asked
for her comments regarding this newly enacted procedure. She stated that
she had no comment.